How it works
Hire on proof you can check yourself.
DevMatch ranks engineers by verified contribution evidence. Every signal traces to a commit hash, a merged PR, a public source — so a shortlist is something you can audit, not just trust.
We rank on proof, not claims
DevMatch ranks engineers by verified contribution evidence drawn from public sources — commits, merged pull requests, and the projects someone actually shipped. A resume asserts; a contribution graph demonstrates. We start from the graph.
Every signal traces to a source
Each line in a candidate read points back to where it came from: a repository, a commit hash, a specific merged PR. Nothing is a black-box score you have to take on faith — you can click through to the public artifact and confirm it yourself.
Verified vs. unverifiable, stated plainly
Work that matches public evidence is marked verified. A claim with no matching public footprint is flagged unverifiable rather than quietly dropped — so a strong-looking profile with nothing behind it doesn't slip through as if it were proven.
Public data only
We work from public contribution history through public APIs (GitHub and similar platforms). No private repositories, no scraping past what those platforms expose publicly.
What the evidence looks like
Illustrative sample. In a real report, every line links to the public artifact it came from.
What this is — and isn't
This is a discovery and evidence tool: it surfaces engineers whose public work matches what you need and shows you the proof. It is not a guarantee of candidate quality or a substitute for your own interview. The point is to start from verified signal instead of unverified claims — you still make the call.